← Search

Michael Hastings

Bellevue, WA
3.5S year-end 2026
42 matches · 23W–19L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.14
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 3 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
4%
down to 3.0
96%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bellevue · 3.5
91 of 119
WA · 3.5
1167 of 1460

Michael is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Michael has been 3.5 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.03.520192020202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022, 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Michael has gone from the 51st to the 45th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2021.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
61.9%
13W–8L · 51.3% of games
4.0
40%
2W–3L · 43.8% of games
7.0
45.5%
5W–6L · 46.7% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 55.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history42 matches
L
2026-05-19 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kamyar Nikzad
−0.043below expectation — took 14% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-04-23 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lee Schelley
−0.045below expectation — took 33% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Roy Higashi / Clifford Hopps
2026-04-15 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jack Young
−0.019below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2023-02-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Jones
−0.015below expectation — took 38% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
Philip Laue / Ramon Calpe
2023-02-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lee Schelley
−0.003about as expected — took 57% of games against 57% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
Joe Duckett / Douglas Jackson
2023-01-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lee Schelley
+0.026better than expected — took 71% of games against 56% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2022-02-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Manning
+0.030better than expected — took 56% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2022-02-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Nolan
−0.037below expectation — took 43% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
Blaine Inafuku
2022-01-07 · #1 Singles · 3.5
−0.113below expectation — took 0% of games against 58% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2021-04-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Manning
−0.012below expectation — took 44% of games against 49% expected
7-5, 7-6
L
Johan Bjorklund / Jeff Jones
2021-04-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Namba
−0.017below expectation — took 29% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2021-03-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Namba
−0.009about as expected — took 50% of games against 55% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.