Search

Thomas Lynch

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
124 matches · 66W–58L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.15
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
3%
down to 3.0
97%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
216 of 256
WA · 3.5
987 of 1209

Thomas is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Thomas has been 3.5 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.03.5202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Thomas has gone from the 17th to the 62nd percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.5
55.3%
21W–17L · 51.4% of games
4.0
65%
13W–7L · 48.1% of games
7.0
60%
15W–10L · 52.4% of games
8.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 49% of games
7.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 40.7% of games
8.0mixed
35.7%
5W–9L · 45.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history124 matches
L
DHARAM PATULE / Ale Jimenezmixed
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deb Nielsen
+0.000below expectation — took 28% of games against 38% expected
7-5, 6-0
L
J Michael Diaz / Joseph Moore
2026-06-07 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steve Oroszlan
0.029below expectation — took 14% of games against 36% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
Tim Ho / Archimedes Orbino
2026-05-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Hull
+0.018better than expected — took 62% of games against 53% expected
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-05-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Walt Paulson
+0.002about as expected — took 52% of games against 52% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Vikas Pabreja / Nik Garkusha
2026-01-31 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pat Nevin
0.034below expectation — took 25% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Akram Hussein / Jiaofeng Xu
2026-01-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Werner
+0.039better than expected — took 65% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
2025-11-09 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Werner
+0.045better than expected — took 86% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Lik Wong
2025-11-08 · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.097below expectation — took 25% of games against 66% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
2025-10-18 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Werner
0.010below expectation — took 29% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
N/Amixed
2025-08-10 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anette Pedersen
+0.000better than expected — took 100% of games against 87% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-06-21 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Helen Suk
+0.000about as expected — took 37% of games against 36% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-05-29 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robb Glenny
0.037below expectation — took 29% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.