← Search

Claudia Huzar

Bellevue, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
105 matches · 58W–47L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Claudia Huzar to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history105 matches
L
2026-08-09 · BC-Hancock · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Geoffrey Seuk mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-01 · BC-Hancock · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alex Camara mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-25 · BC-Lopez/Kaptik · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mario Lopez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · BC-Lopez/Kaptik · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Halos mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-14 · BC-Hancock · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Myers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-04 · BC-Hancock/Johnson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Graves
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-21 · BC-Hancock/Johnson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elena Harnish
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-01 · BC-Hancock/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Graves
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-04-23 · BC-Hancock/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Graves
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-02 · BC-Hancock/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Graves
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-03-08 · BC-Hancock/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Graves
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-03-01 · BC-Landry · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Landry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
65.2%
43W–23L · 58.5% of games
4.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 36.6% of games
7.0mixed
20%
2W–8L · 35.7% of games
8.0mixed
50%
8W–8L · 49.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
25 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe