Search

Claudia Huzar

Bellevue, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
103 matches · 58W–45L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.46
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 20 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
69%
stay 3.5
31%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 92% stay · 8% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.39. Lower than today’s 3.46 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bellevue · 3.5
7 of 96
WA · 3.5
144 of 1209

Claudia is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Claudia has been 3.5 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Claudia has gone from the 48th to the 92nd percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
65.2%
43W–23L · 58.5% of games
4.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 36.6% of games
7.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 36.1% of games
8.0mixed
50%
8W–8L · 49.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history103 matches
W
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mario Lopez
+0.000below expectation — took 47% of games against 60% expected
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Halos
+0.000about as expected — took 41% of games against 43% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Kim Li Eng / Robert Holmgrenmixed
2026-06-14 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Myers
+0.000below expectation — took 37% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Graves
+0.008better than expected — took 75% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Jane Saddler / Caren Gillespie
2026-05-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elena Harnish
+0.019better than expected — took 86% of games against 67% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Graves
0.037below expectation — took 59% of games against 70% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Sarah Trester / Ingrid Foster
2026-04-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Graves
0.008below expectation — took 37% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Tina Sypher / Trisha Hoss
2026-04-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Graves
+0.034better than expected — took 92% of games against 67% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
Hien Nguyen / Katie Jergens
2026-03-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Graves
+0.014better than expected — took 59% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-03-01 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Landry
+0.051better than expected — took 57% of games against 37% expected
7-6, 5-3
W
2026-01-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Walker
+0.032better than expected — took 80% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-01-10 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Graves
0.004below expectation — took 33% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.