← Search

Carol LaMoria

Redmond, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
168 matches · 97W–71L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Carol LaMoria to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history168 matches
L
2026-09-12 · PL-18+40=OLD-LaMoria · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patrick Lamoria mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
W
N/A
2026-08-07 · PL-LaMoria · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patrick Lamoria mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-01 · PL-LaMoria · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sherman Tang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-25 · PL-LaMoria · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Badrinath Vengalathur mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-27 · PL-LaMoria · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patrick Lamoria mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-04 · RBW-Wyman · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennie Cecil-Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-05-29 · RBW-Wyman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennie Cecil-Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-22 · RBW-Wyman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannen Wyman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-05-08 · RBW-Wyman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristine Kleinsmith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-01 · RBW-Wyman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristine Kleinsmith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-24 · RBW-Wyman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennie Cecil-Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-17 · RBW-Wyman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristine Kleinsmith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
64.8%
57W–31L · 58.6% of games
3.5
45.5%
15W–18L · 47.6% of games
6.0mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 57.8% of games
7.0mixed
56%
14W–11L · 55.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
34 matches
#1 Singles
19%
32 matches
#2 Singles
6%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer