← Search

Erica Wiechers

Bainbridge Island, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
83 matches · 37W–46L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.21
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 17 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bainbridge Island · 3.5
6 of 7
WA · 3.5
857 of 1209

Erica is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Erica has been a steady 3.5 across all 7 seasons on record.

3.03.52019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Erica has gone from the 37th to the 49th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
0.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
48.3%
28W–30L · 49% of games
4.0
0%
0W–11L · 33.3% of games
7.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 61.4% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history83 matches
W
2026-05-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Enns-Ford
−0.002about as expected — took 57% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
N/A
2026-05-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Enns-Ford
+0.006better than expected — took 100% of games against 81% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Enns-Ford
−0.041below expectation — took 41% of games against 58% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-04-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Enns-Ford
−0.043below expectation — took 37% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-04-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Enns-Ford
+0.005about as expected — took 60% of games against 57% expected
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Enns-Ford
+0.033better than expected — took 71% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Allyson Jackson / Julie Moran
2026-04-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Whitlock
−0.046below expectation — took 29% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Ann Chen / Darci Wyman
2026-03-08 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Wooton
−0.011about as expected — took 47% of games against 51% expected
6-7, 3-1
L
Susan Kim / Lyndsey Gillis
2026-02-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Corinne Wolffe
−0.021below expectation — took 20% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-02-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Enns-Ford
+0.032better than expected — took 50% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Wooton
+0.015better than expected — took 80% of games against 66% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Hedi Carpenter / Xiaoyi Ye
2026-01-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Corinne Wolffe
−0.016below expectation — took 38% of games against 46% expected
7-6, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.