← Search

Anna Graves

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
148 matches · 103W–45L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Anna Graves to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history148 matches
W
2026-06-04 · BC-Hancock/Johnson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claudia Huzar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-05-29 · BC-Hancock/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-05-07 · BC-Hancock/Johnson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Hurt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-01 · BC-Hancock/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claudia Huzar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-04-23 · BC-Hancock/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claudia Huzar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-09 · BC-Hancock/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-02 · BC-Hancock/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claudia Huzar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-03-08 · BC-Hancock/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claudia Huzar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-03-01 · BC-Hancock/Johnson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-02-22 · BC-Landry · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carolyn Frederick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-01-10 · BC-Landry · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Claudia Huzar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-09 · BC-Hancock/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claudia Huzar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
89.7%
35W–4L · 74% of games
3.5
70.1%
47W–20L · 60.1% of games
4.0
42.9%
12W–16L · 45.9% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 60.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 45% of the time
#1 Singles
45%
67 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
23 matches
#2 Singles
4%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
4%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe