← Search

Kirstin Anderson

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
131 matches · 87W–44L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kirstin Anderson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history131 matches
W
2026-06-05 · TCSP-Anderson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julia Hartvigson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-22 · TCSP-Anderson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Marcotte Solimano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-24 · TCSP-Anderson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Wietholter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-17 · TCSP-Anderson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Cahill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-10 · TCSP-Anderson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Meldahl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-03 · TCSP-Anderson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alyssa Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-03-06 · NTC-Shake and Bake-Blum · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Shewey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-28 · NTC-Shake and Bake-Blum · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Hsu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-01-18 · NTC-Shake and Bake-Blum · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julia Hartvigson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-01-10 · NTC-Shake and Bake-Blum · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Hathaway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-01-09 · NTC-Shake and Bake-Blum · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julia Hartvigson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-07-25 · NE Seattle Gals (Flexible) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa McMurray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
87.5%
35W–5L · 67.1% of games
4.0
56.9%
41W–31L · 54.1% of games
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
52 matches
#1 Singles
26%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
17 matches
#2 Singles
11%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
9%
12 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe