Search

Kirstin Anderson

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
131 matches · 87W–44L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.59
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
12%
down to 3.5
88%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 8% down · 92% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.61. Higher than today’s 3.59 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 4.0
129 of 186
WA · 4.0
571 of 782

Kirstin is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kirstin has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Kirstin has gone from the 37th to the 42nd percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
87.5%
35W–5L · 67.1% of games
4.0
56.9%
41W–31L · 54.1% of games
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history131 matches
W
2026-06-05 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julia Hartvigson
+0.030better than expected — took 55% of games against 43% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-22 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Marcotte Solimano
0.012about as expected — took 48% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
Noriko Kilambi / Gina Jaffe
2026-04-24 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Wietholter
+0.012about as expected — took 45% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Cahill
+0.007about as expected — took 33% of games against 35% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Meldahl
0.055below expectation — took 20% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alyssa Campbell
+0.001about as expected — took 54% of games against 54% expected
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
Catherine Davidson / Diana Stroble
2026-03-06 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Shewey
0.050below expectation — took 29% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-02-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Hsu
+0.008better than expected — took 53% of games against 48% expected
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-01-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julia Hartvigson
0.004about as expected — took 58% of games against 59% expected
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-01-10 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Hathaway
+0.004better than expected — took 67% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Teresa Graff / Barbara Smith
2026-01-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julia Hartvigson
+0.008better than expected — took 71% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa McMurray
0.012below expectation — took 35% of games against 43% expected
7-5, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.