← Search

Alyssa Campbell

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
85 matches · 41W–44L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.68
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 7 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.5
99%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 4.0
89 of 186
WA · 4.0
405 of 782

Alyssa is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Alyssa has been a steady 4.0 across all 8 seasons on record.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Alyssa has gone from the 22nd to the 42nd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.0
51.4%
37W–35L · 48.9% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 45.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history85 matches
L
2026-05-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Cahill
−0.010about as expected — took 47% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-30 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julia Hartvigson
+0.002better than expected — took 71% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-04-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kirstin Anderson
+0.000about as expected — took 54% of games against 54% expected
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-03-27 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Hathaway
−0.003about as expected — took 41% of games against 43% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-03-06 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Wietholter
−0.029below expectation — took 29% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-02-22 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julia Hartvigson
+0.017better than expected — took 56% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Cahill
+0.023better than expected — took 44% of games against 39% expected
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-05-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Shewey
+0.019better than expected — took 61% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 5-5
W
2025-05-08 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Cahill
−0.013below expectation — took 44% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-04-25 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Wietholter
+0.008about as expected — took 43% of games against 43% expected
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-04-04 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julia Hartvigson
+0.068better than expected — took 92% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-03-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Cahill
−0.015about as expected — took 61% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.