Search

Maria Olano

Redmond, WA
4.0C year-end 2024
112 matches · 73W–39L · seasons 20192024
Where Maria sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Maria is one of 1013 women at 4.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 89% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Maria has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.0201920202021202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Maria has gone from the 63rd to the 48th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
73.9%
34W–12L · 60.5% of games
4.0
60%
12W–8L · 50.4% of games
7.0mixed
65.2%
15W–8L · 56% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 54.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history112 matches
W
Evgeniya Berger / Erin Logsdon
2024-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Riley
+0.012about as expected — took 47% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2024-04-05 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annie Luong
0.006about as expected — took 65% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
2024-03-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Ruffini
+0.003about as expected — took 29% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Brian Peters / Kim Weyermixed
2023-08-12 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Richie Sugimoto
+0.000about as expected — took 67% of games against 67% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2023-08-11 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ryan Hoy
+0.000better than expected — took 92% of games against 66% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2023-06-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Liliia Ozerska
+0.018better than expected — took 67% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2023-05-05 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Liliia Ozerska
+0.023better than expected — took 41% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2023-04-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Latasha Khan
0.041below expectation — took 50% of games against 64% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2023-04-21 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Latasha Khan
+0.046better than expected — took 72% of games against 49% expected
7-5, 6-0
L
2023-02-26 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Terri Smith
0.000about as expected — took 33% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2023-02-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Terri Smith
+0.032better than expected — took 67% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2023-02-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly McCallum
+0.017better than expected — took 63% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.