Search

Anna Ruffini

Redmond, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
122 matches · 71W–51L · seasons 20212025
Where Anna sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Anna is one of 1525 women at 3.5 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 65% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Anna has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

3.03.54.020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Anna has gone from the 31st to the 3rd percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
81%
17W–4L · 62.1% of games
3.5
67.4%
31W–15L · 56.7% of games
4.0
26.3%
10W–28L · 41.4% of games
6.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 75.4% of games
7.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 65.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history122 matches
L
2025-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Logsdon
0.077below expectation — took 14% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sue Junker
0.015below expectation — took 33% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gina Rogers
0.018below expectation — took 33% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nozomi Park
0.011below expectation — took 23% of games against 35% expected
6-0, 4-3
L
2025-04-11 · #2 Singles · 4.0
0.021below expectation — took 20% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-04-04 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gina Rogers
0.036below expectation — took 29% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-03-28 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gina Rogers
+0.020better than expected — took 53% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
Adrienne Pierce / Joanna Foss
2025-03-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Madalena McAllen
+0.021better than expected — took 58% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-03-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with YASEMIN CANKAYA
0.023below expectation — took 33% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2024-08-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ginny Larsen
+0.022better than expected — took 39% of games against 33% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2024-08-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ginny Larsen
+0.016better than expected — took 63% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2024-07-26 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ginny Larsen
+0.011about as expected — took 41% of games against 38% expected
7-6, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.