← Search

Jennifer Zell

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
82 matches · 57W–25L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Zell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history82 matches
W
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · with Sue Verduin championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-20 · TCSP-Shot Takers-Knoll · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-08 · TCSP-Shot Takers-Knoll · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-04-24 · TCSP-Shot Takers-Knoll · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-16 · TCSP-Shot Takers-Knoll · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-04-10 · TCSP-Shot Takers-Knoll · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-02-28 · TCSP-McCoy · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-06 · TCSP-McCoy · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbara Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-01-24 · TCSP-McCoy · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2025-12-06 · #2 Doubles · with Sally Ferrin championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-22 · TCSP-Double Nickels-Knoll · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Ogborn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-26 · TCSP-Double Nickels-Knoll · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sally Ferrin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
72.1%
44W–17L · 60.9% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 61.6% of games
9.0
0%
0W–4L · 30.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 50% of the time
#1 Singles
50%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
15 matches
#2 Singles
15%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova