← Search

Chelsea Schanno

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
150 matches · 101W–49L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Chelsea Schanno to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history150 matches
L
2026-08-03 · Carlos Here We Come · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with EJ Blanchfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-06 · Carlos Here We Come · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah McKinney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-05 · STC-Mitchell · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kieran Oaksmith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-15 · STC-Mitchell · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kieran Oaksmith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-08 · STC-Mitchell · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie McReynolds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-03-27 · STC-Mitchell · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah McKinney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-01-04 · STC-Mitchell · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kieran Oaksmith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-07-25 · CARLOS HERE WE COME · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kieran Oaksmith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-07-20 · CARLOS HERE WE COME · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with EJ Blanchfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-07-02 · CARLOS HERE WE COME · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah McKinney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2025-06-15 · CARLOS HERE WE COME · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with EJ Blanchfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-05-16 · STC-Garcia Later! · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah McKinney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
95%
19W–1L · 70.3% of games
3.5
66.7%
26W–13L · 56.8% of games
4.0
43.9%
25W–32L · 47.1% of games
6.0mixed
100%
7W–0L · 78.5% of games
7.0mixed
100%
9W–0L · 75.2% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 64% of the time
#1 Doubles
64%
96 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
20 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert