Teams

Carlos Here We Come

2026 One Doubles · 4.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-03vs The RacketeeresLost 01
L#1 DoublesEJ Blanchfield / Chelsea Schanno vs Duyen Truong / Aline Pereira3-6, 2-6
2026-07-25vs Happy HourLost 01
L#1 DoublesMelanie Kosloff / Kieran Oaksmith vs Akari Fried / Kana Waldron4-6, 4-6
2026-07-24vs Meet Me At MidcourtLost 01
L#1 DoublesEJ Blanchfield / Melanie Kosloff vs Sandra Cornwall / Amy Pavelich3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-07-16vs The Fifth ElementLost 01
L#1 DoublesSarah McKinney / Kieran Oaksmith vs Cat Zhang / Lyndia Brumback1-6, 4-5
2026-07-06vs Sweaty BettysLost 01
L#1 DoublesSarah McKinney / Chelsea Schanno vs Carol Gregory / Laura Walsh6-7, 2-6
2026-06-30vs Summer SwingersLost 01
L#1 DoublesEJ Blanchfield / Sarah McKinney vs Sara Addicott / Lisa Mckenny1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Melanie Kosloff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Kieran Oaksmith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Chelsea Schanno
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Sarah McKinney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.29
EJ Blanchfield
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah McKinney + EJ Blanchfield6358% games+6.3% vs expected
EJ Blanchfield + Melanie Kosloff4360% games+5.3% vs expected
Sarah McKinney + Kieran Oaksmith7357% games+4.4% vs expected
Kieran Oaksmith + Chelsea Schanno351857% games+4.3% vs expected
Sarah McKinney + Chelsea Schanno9453% games+0.8% vs expected
EJ Blanchfield + Chelsea Schanno181154% games+0.8% vs expected
EJ Blanchfield + Kieran Oaksmith314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Melanie Kosloff
56W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Kieran Oaksmith
69W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
Chelsea Schanno
101W–49L career · 2 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Sarah McKinney
74W–44L career · 3 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
3.46
3.5
EJ Blanchfield
72W–57L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.