Search

Melanie Kosloff

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
80 matches · 56W–24L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.72
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
100%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 4.0
77 of 186
WA · 4.0
318 of 782

Melanie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Melanie has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Melanie has gone from the 89th to the 36th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 72.8% of games
3.5
82.8%
24W–5L · 64.7% of games
4.0
46.2%
12W–14L · 53.5% of games
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 65.9% of games
7.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 74.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history80 matches
L
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kieran Oaksmith
+0.007about as expected — took 40% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with EJ Blanchfield
+0.012about as expected — took 45% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina L Garcia
+0.051better than expected — took 71% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-03-06 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Scalzo
0.004about as expected — took 38% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-03-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina L Garcia
0.009below expectation — took 28% of games against 37% expected
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-02-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Scalzo
0.021below expectation — took 25% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Dana Landry / Helen Lee
2026-01-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bridget Rodden
+0.010better than expected — took 75% of games against 64% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-01-17 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Scalzo
+0.026better than expected — took 67% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kieran Oaksmith
+0.040better than expected — took 63% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Kimberly McCallum / Erin Logsdon
2025-03-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Scalzo
0.021below expectation — took 42% of games against 52% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-02-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah McKinney
+0.003about as expected — took 48% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-02-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicki Nelson
0.054below expectation — took 39% of games against 62% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.