← Search

Jeannie Pae

Mercer Island, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
84 matches · 50W–34L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jeannie Pae to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history84 matches
L
2026-05-16 · MI-Holtzclaw · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sally Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-01 · MI-Holtzclaw · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Olivia Shone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-26 · MI-Holtzclaw · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Olivia Shone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-03-01 · MI-of the Tiger-Gregory · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Olivia Shone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-02-22 · MI-of the Tiger-Gregory · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Olivia Shone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-02-13 · MI-of the Tiger-Gregory · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristen Glant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-01-11 · MI-of the Tiger-Gregory · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Olivia Shone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-10-25 · MI-Deucebags and Divas-Gregory · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jason Kim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-10-11 · MI-Deucebags and Divas-Gregory · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jason Kim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-10-05 · MI-Deucebags and Divas-Gregory · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jason Kim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-07-31 · Shanks-a-lot · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Olivia Shone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-07-30 · Shanks-a-lot · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Olivia Shone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
46.7%
7W–8L · 50.9% of games
4.0
51.6%
16W–15L · 53.2% of games
7.0mixed
65.2%
15W–8L · 57.3% of games
8.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 64.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
9 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe