Search

Olivia Shone

Mercer Island, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
64 matches · 31W–33L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.79
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
100%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Mercer Island · 4.0
10 of 45
WA · 4.0
178 of 782

Olivia is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Olivia has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.020192023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Olivia has gone from the 64th to the 97th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 57.7% of games
4.0
55%
22W–18L · 53.3% of games
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 54.7% of games
8.0mixed
12.5%
1W–7L · 43.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history64 matches
L
Jessica Blakeslee / Morgan Hunter
2026-05-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeannie Pae
0.032below expectation — took 29% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeannie Pae
0.009about as expected — took 62% of games against 63% expected
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-03-28 · #2 Doubles · with Carol Gregory
0.045below expectation — took 35% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
Tina L Garcia / Melanie Kosloff
2026-03-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeannie Pae
+0.009better than expected — took 72% of games against 63% expected
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-02-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeannie Pae
+0.058better than expected — took 80% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-01-11 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeannie Pae
+0.090better than expected — took 100% of games against 51% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-10-18 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jason Kim
+0.000about as expected — took 44% of games against 49% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-10-05 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with PETER GOODMAN
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-07-31 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeannie Pae
0.005about as expected — took 43% of games against 46% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
Jessica Blakeslee / Catherine Foster
2025-07-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeannie Pae
+0.033better than expected — took 59% of games against 44% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
2025-07-13 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Nordale
+0.000below expectation — took 55% of games against 67% expected
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
Mina Park / Cindy Park
2025-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Sowers
0.009below expectation — took 47% of games against 53% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.