← Search

Elisabeth Newkirk

Redmond, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
190 matches · 126W–64L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Elisabeth Newkirk to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history190 matches
L
2026-05-29 · CP-Sunshine Fields-Hansen · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tara James
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-15 · CP-Sunshine Fields-Hansen · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa O'Brochta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-03-20 · #1 Doubles · with Laura Young championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-03-01 · CP-Queens of the Court-Chinn · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-02-21 · CP-Queens of the Court-Chinn · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mingming Zhan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-02-06 · CP-Queens of the Court-Chinn · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Priyanka Joshi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-02-01 · CP-Queens of the Court-Chinn · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-12-11 · #3 Doubles · with Joe van Zyl championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2025-11-15 · ETC-Can't Drive 55-Wyer · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cynthia Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-08 · ETC-Can't Drive 55-Wyer · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynn Casey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-11-08 · CP-Murray · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Teresa Morrow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2025-11-02 · CP-Mixed Shots-Marquart · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joe van Zyl mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
94.7%
18W–1L · 68.6% of games
3.0
74.4%
29W–10L · 62.2% of games
3.5
46.9%
15W–17L · 51.6% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
70%
7W–3L · 57.1% of games
7.0
60%
9W–6L · 56.8% of games
8.0
50%
2W–2L · 54.5% of games
6.0mixed
80%
12W–3L · 61.2% of games
7.0mixed
72%
18W–7L · 57% of games
8.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 35.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
93 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
34 matches
#1 Singles
5%
10 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert