← Search

Kristen Stead

Brier, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
134 matches · 71W–63L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kristen Stead to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history134 matches
L
2026-08-09 · CAC/SL-In Denial-King · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joseph Ching mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-31 · CAC/SL-In Denial-King · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joseph Ching mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-26 · CAC/SL-In Denial-King · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Peters mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-11 · CAC/SL-In Denial-King · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Peters mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-04 · NWW-FC-Pinkerton · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jude Neldam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-29 · NWW-FC-Pinkerton · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jude Neldam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-05-27 · CAC/SL-Hofmann · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shelly Finn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
N/A
2026-05-12 · CAC/SL-Hofmann · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Kushibuchi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-04 · CAC/SL-Hofmann · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shelly Finn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-04-28 · NWW-FC-Pinkerton · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jude Neldam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-11-15 · CAC/SL-50 Shades of Play-Peters · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Kushibuchi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-02 · CAC/SL-50 Shades of Play-Peters · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristin Peters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
69.4%
25W–11L · 57.2% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0
51.7%
15W–14L · 53% of games
7.0
42.9%
9W–12L · 48.9% of games
6.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 67% of games
7.0mixed
39.1%
9W–14L · 52.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
52 matches
#1 Doubles
37%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
32 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer