← Search

Cathy Hollar

Kent, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
138 matches · 43W–95L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Cathy Hollar to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history138 matches
L
2026-09-12 · BETC-Hollar · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with MARILYN PORTER
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-12 · BETC-Ikeda 6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with MARILYN PORTER
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-04 · BETC-Ikeda 6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy Morse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-21 · BETC-Ikeda 6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with MARILYN PORTER
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-23 · BETC-Ikeda 6.0W · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy Morse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-03-29 · #1 Doubles · with Lynne Nowicki championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-03-01 · NWW-BETC-Ikeda · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Wang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-02-28 · NWW-BETC-Ikeda · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Wang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-01-25 · NWW-BETC-Ikeda · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Wang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-01-10 · NWW-BETC-Ikeda · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Wakefield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-11-22 · BETC-Hollar · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nona Allison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-11-02 · BETC-Hollar · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rebecca Mann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
47.8%
11W–12L · 47% of games
3.5
22%
11W–39L · 39.1% of games
6.0
50%
6W–6L · 47.8% of games
7.0
26.5%
9W–25L · 41.1% of games
6.0mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 45.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
42 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams