← Search

Lori Estes

Seattle, WA
2.5C year-end 2025
39 matches · 9W–30L · seasons 2022–2026
Bump probability
2.02.53.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.49
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 5 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.0
57%
stay 2.5
43%
up to 3.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 88% stay · 12% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.41. Lower than today’s 2.49 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 2.5 runs from 2.01 to 2.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 2.5
7 of 17
WA · 2.5
42 of 81

Lori is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lori has played at 3.0, 2.5 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.02.53.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Lori has gone from the 21st to the 3rd percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
17.2%
5W–24L · 36% of games
6.0
50%
3W–3L · 50.5% of games
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 35.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history39 matches
W
Jane Vail / Monica Spain
2026-02-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barbara Selemon
+0.021better than expected — took 63% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Kathy Wang / Cathy Hollar
2026-01-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Parker
−0.005about as expected — took 40% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Suzanne Vannatter / Veena Shankaran
2026-01-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barbara Selemon
−0.020below expectation — took 20% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-11-01 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Selemon
−0.001below expectation — took 25% of games against 33% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
N/A
2025-10-12 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Monica Leers
+0.084better than expected — took 100% of games against 54% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-08-10 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Curt Jacobson
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 33% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Juiling Edmonds / Derek Edmondsmixed
2025-08-02 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rob Ward
+0.000about as expected — took 29% of games against 32% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-06-21 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Curt Jacobson
+0.000better than expected — took 65% of games against 49% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
AliceJane Brush / Lavina Poorswani
2025-03-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barbara Selemon
+0.002below expectation — took 29% of games against 35% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-02-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ann Bowden
+0.005about as expected — took 38% of games against 38% expected
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2025-01-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Morse
+0.010about as expected — took 48% of games against 43% expected
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
2024-05-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Morse
−0.077below expectation — took 14% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.