Search

Amy Morse

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
108 matches · 45W–63L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.84
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 20 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
98%
stay 3.0
2%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
108 of 144
WA · 3.0
514 of 755

Amy is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Amy has been 3.0 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.0201920222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Amy has gone from the 62nd to the 21st percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
30.5%
18W–41L · 42.4% of games
6.0
50%
16W–16L · 49.9% of games
6.0mixed
62.5%
10W–6L · 50.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history108 matches
L
Pam Rasanen / Holly Conley
2026-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cathy Hollar
0.033below expectation — took 14% of games against 37% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Bunny Rogan / Julie Dewitt
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Doris Cruz
0.009below expectation — took 32% of games against 39% expected
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-05-15 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with MARILYN PORTER
0.008below expectation — took 33% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Colleen Tracy / Bethlyn Whitney
2026-05-08 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lauri Iwasaki
+0.010about as expected — took 35% of games against 35% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
Rosie Mastrandrea / Sibylle Brown
2026-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Felicia Ng
+0.031better than expected — took 71% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-04-24 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Julie Ikeda
0.025below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Jeanette Brandal / Jill Snyder
2026-04-23 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cathy Hollar
+0.081better than expected — took 92% of games against 49% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Heather Michail / Cara Winterchamps
2026-03-29 · #3 Doubles · with Rebecca Mann
+0.020better than expected — took 53% of games against 45% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Elise Harper / Deirdre O'Connor
2026-03-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yan Mathison
0.018below expectation — took 28% of games against 40% expected
7-5, 6-0
L
Andreanna Kapogiannatos / Kathryn Wenger
2026-02-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Wakefield
0.037below expectation — took 20% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-02-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynne Nowicki
+0.037better than expected — took 59% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
Karen Hayward / Susan van Meter
2026-02-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debbie Donovan
0.003about as expected — took 62% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.