← Search

Penny Jay

Brier, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
203 matches · 138W–65L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.09
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 29 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
14%
stay 3.0
86%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 59% stay · 41% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.98. Lower than today’s 3.09 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 3.0
121 of 755

Penny is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Penny has been 3.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Penny has gone from the 29th to the 71st percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
61.3%
57W–36L · 53.7% of games
3.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 47.7% of games
6.0
80%
48W–12L · 58.3% of games
6.0mixed
91.7%
11W–1L · 73% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history203 matches
L
Nichole Ikeda / Hannah Smolinskichamps
2026-06-12 · #2 Doubles · with Jennifer Turner
−0.021below expectation — took 48% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Marilyn Pedersen / Leslie Fields
2026-06-08 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Homa Assefi
+0.016better than expected — took 86% of games against 68% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Sally Linebarger / MaryAnn O'Connell
2026-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debbie Schrock
+0.002about as expected — took 53% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-22 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debbie Schrock
−0.031below expectation — took 47% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
Heather West / Alysson Bashey
2026-05-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Turner
−0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 70% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-15 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debbie Schrock
+0.008better than expected — took 67% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Julie Dewitt / Bunny Rogan
2026-05-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elisse Priskila
+0.036better than expected — took 65% of games against 47% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mindy Mignogna
+0.038better than expected — took 71% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Roseshel Howe / Stacey Roehrs
2026-05-06 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Edith Matulka
−0.010about as expected — took 62% of games against 63% expected
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
Allison Lieb / Sri Ramya Dandu
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill LaRosa
−0.028below expectation — took 44% of games against 56% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Stephanie Artati / Meghan Bradner
2026-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kendall Kracke
+0.023better than expected — took 60% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-17 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Edith Matulka
−0.008about as expected — took 61% of games against 62% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.