← Search

Carol Rea

Edmonds, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
159 matches · 77W–82L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Carol Rea to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history159 matches
W
2026-08-08 · HBSQ-Garfield/Rea · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Abram mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-02 · HBSQ-Garfield/Rea · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Samuel Bradley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-31 · HBSQ-Vitcovich · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Mary Heller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-26 · HBSQ-Ageless Aces-Tameishi · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Brindle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-13 · HBSQ-Ageless Aces-Tameishi · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bonnie Flock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-06 · HBSQ-Ageless Aces-Tameishi · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Heller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-21 · HBSQ-Clark · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ellen Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-04-17 · HBSQ-Tierney · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Heller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-13 · HBSQ-Clark · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Hewitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-31 · HBSQ-Ageless Aces-Tameishi · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vicki Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-11-22 · HBSQ-Vitcovich · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Corliss Liekkio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-10-26 · HBSQ-Vitcovich · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Heller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
84.6%
11W–2L · 62.7% of games
3.0
35.3%
6W–11L · 44.5% of games
3.5
27.8%
5W–13L · 43.8% of games
6.0
50%
3W–3L · 54.1% of games
7.0
46.3%
19W–22L · 49.4% of games
8.0
25%
3W–9L · 39.2% of games
7.0mixed
63.6%
21W–12L · 55.8% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
80 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
29 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova