← Search

Rachel Rubens

Renton, WA
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
14 matches · 12W–2L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Rachel Rubens to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history14 matches
L
2026-07-23 · The M&Ms · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Schultink
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-14 · The M&Ms · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Schultink
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-05-20 · BC-Krekel · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tish Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-13 · BC-Krekel · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tish Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-03-31 · BC-Krekel · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tish Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2024-05-29 · BC-Krekel · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brooke Krekel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2024-05-21 · BC-Krekel · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brooke Krekel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2024-05-01 · BC-Krekel · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brooke Krekel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2024-04-24 · BC-Krekel · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brooke Krekel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W
2024-04-17 · BC-Krekel · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brooke Krekel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2023-05-23 · BC-Krekel · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Brooke Krekel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2023-05-17 · BC-Krekel · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Brooke Krekel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 73.8% of games
3.0
80%
8W–2L · 63% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 79% of the time
#1 Doubles
79%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal