← Search

Edith Laird

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
90 matches · 43W–47L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Edith Laird to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
W
2026-09-01 · Tenacious E · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-30 · Tenacious E · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-31 · TCSP-Summer Lobbing-Gatcheco · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Prithu Jain mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-10 · TCSP-Summer Lobbing-Gatcheco · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Daniel Shen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-23 · Tenacious E · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-6
L
2026-06-21 · TCSP-Summer Lobbing-Gatcheco · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Prithu Jain mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-16 · Tenacious E · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-14 · TCSP-Summer Lobbing-Gatcheco · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark Moskal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-30 · TCSP-Sharks-Bullard · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-17 · TCSP-Sharks-Bullard · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-15 · TCSP-Slice Cream Sundaes-Gatcheco · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-09 · TCSP-Sharks-Bullard · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
52.8%
28W–25L · 50.9% of games
3.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 48.4% of games
6.0mixed
46.2%
12W–14L · 46.3% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 34% of the time
#1 Singles
34%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
13 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
4 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer