Search

Edith Laird

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
84 matches · 39W–45L · seasons 20242026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.83
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 26 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
98%
stay 3.0
2%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
164 of 252
WA · 3.0
686 of 1107

Edith is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Edith has been a steady 3.0 across all 3 seasons on record.

2.53.0202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Edith has gone from the 30th to the 31st percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
51%
26W–25L · 50.5% of games
3.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 48.4% of games
6.0
75%
3W–1L · 72.4% of games
6.0mixed
38.9%
7W–11L · 43.4% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history84 matches
W
2026-07-31 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Prithu Jain
+0.000about as expected — took 54% of games against 50% expected
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
Xiaobei Li / Mihai Popoaeimixed
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Daniel Shen
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Iris Cai
2026-06-23 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.010better than expected — took 63% of games against 57% expected
6-1, 6-6
L
Ryan Burlinson / Gayle Burlinsonmixed
2026-06-21 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Prithu Jain
+0.000about as expected — took 44% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
Ninona Boujrada
2026-06-16 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.005about as expected — took 44% of games against 47% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Nellie Jie / Radu Draganmixed
2026-06-14 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark Moskal
+0.000about as expected — took 44% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
Qiong Wei
2026-05-30 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.039below expectation — took 38% of games against 56% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Christa Hansma
2026-05-17 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.084below expectation — took 20% of games against 60% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-05-15 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.064better than expected — took 41% of games against 21% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-05-09 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.002about as expected — took 44% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
Chen Xie
2026-04-26 · #2 Singles · 3.0
0.006about as expected — took 37% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Bethany Haddad
2026-04-13 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.002about as expected — took 53% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 3-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.