← Search

Annette de Soto

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 35W–29L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Annette de Soto to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
L
2026-09-07 · de Soto · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-06 · de Soto · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-09-01 · de Soto · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-12 · TCSP-Grass Kickers-Campos/Choder · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patrick Garland mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-11 · TCSP-Volley Vibes-de Soto · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Albert Israel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-28 · TCSP-Grass Kickers-Campos/Choder · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark Moskal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-20 · TCSP-Volley Vibes-de Soto · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bruce Cordingly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-19 · TCSP-Grass Kickers-Campos/Choder · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark Moskal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-03 · BTA-Utter · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-0
W
2026-05-26 · BTA-Utter · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Utter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-26 · de Soto Flex (prefer day) · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-18 · de Soto Flex (prefer day) · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
50%
2W–2L · 53.2% of games
2.5
60.7%
17W–11L · 52.9% of games
3.0
54.2%
13W–11L · 51% of games
6.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 54.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 55% of the time
#1 Singles
55%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
8%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe