Teams

TCSP-Spain

2026 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.82 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-16vs RTC-Tennis Mavens-SimmondsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLisa Adamek / Delia Fontaine vs Robin Aronson / Sandra Stapleton6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBeth Schryer / Jill Walzer vs Holly Hovey / Alane Diehl3-6, 2-6
2025-11-08vs STC-AncinasLost 02
L#2 DoublesLeona Zamora / Lisa Sowder vs April Ancinas / Eda Topur6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJill Walzer / Suzanne Kalberer vs Jamie Rawding / Marybeth Alwood6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2025-10-19vs NWW-BETC-IkedaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLeona Zamora / Erin Kennedy vs Denise Dubuque / Pamela Menchaca0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Adamek / Delia Fontaine vs Izumi Sullivan / Kumiko Kamplaine7-6, 6-2
2025-10-12vs ETC-Landry-NavarroLost 12
W#1 DoublesDelia Fontaine / Michiko Kono vs Darla Schlumberger / Mary Rich2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBeth Schryer / Suzanne Kalberer vs Darla Donnelly / Kim Siegrist0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMonica Spain / Margaret Stuart vs Tina Allen / Cristin Donovan1-6, 1-6
2025-10-05vs NTC-Dream Team 2.0-GilbertLost 12
L#1 DoublesLisa Adamek / Michiko Kono vs Valerie Gilbert / Rosemary Curran1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBeth Schryer / Jill Walzer vs Donna Lou / Virginia Nordberg3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesErin Kennedy / Leona Zamora vs Lesley Burvill Holmes / Susan Bonner6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-09-27vs PL-DayLost 02
L#2 DoublesJill Walzer / Margaret Stuart vs Carolyn McKernan / Tami DeVita3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Adamek / Suzanne Kalberer vs Brenda Schlemlein / Jan Day2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-09-21vs RBW-GibsonLost 02
L#1 DoublesDelia Fontaine / Jill Walzer vs Pam Rasanen / Kelly Silver4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Adamek / Monica Spain vs Brigitte Marbaix / Yuriko Rosnow1-6, 2-6
2025-09-05vs STC-AncinasLost 03
L#1 DoublesLisa Adamek / Delia Fontaine vs Celia Evans / Mari Revere2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesErin Kennedy / Margaret Stuart vs Jane Stonecipher / Eda Topur1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBeth Schryer / Michiko Kono vs Kathleen Perkins / Jamie Rawding1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.43 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.66
Delia Fontaine
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.64
Leona Zamora
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.61
Lisa Williamson
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.60
Annette de Soto
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.58
Erin Kennedy
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.57
Lisa Adamek
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.43
Jill Walzer
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.29
Lisa Sowder
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.27
Suzanne Kalberer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.26
Margaret Stuart
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.25
Michiko Kono
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.24
Beth Schryer
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.12
Monica Spain
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monica Spain + Lisa Williamson10855% games+3.5% vs expected
Lisa Adamek + Michiko Kono6551% games+2.2% vs expected
Monica Spain + Lisa Sowder3248% games−1.8% vs expected
Suzanne Kalberer + Lisa Williamson3547% games−2.5% vs expected
Lisa Williamson + Annette de Soto5447% games−2.6% vs expected
Suzanne Kalberer + Lisa Sowder3350% gamesnot enough data
Suzanne Kalberer + Jill Walzer0538% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Williamson + Delia Fontaine2349% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Delia Fontaine
27W–31L career · 5 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
3
Leona Zamora
45W–40L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64
2.5
Lisa Williamson
48W–66L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%21%79%
2.61
3
Annette de Soto
34W–27L career · 6 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
3
Erin Kennedy
64W–53L career · 3 lines in 2026
28%71%<1%
2.58
3
Lisa Adamek
16W–40L career · 6 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
2.57
3
Jill Walzer
31W–51L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
2.43
Lisa Sowder
16W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.29
Suzanne Kalberer
19W–30L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Margaret Stuart
22W–55L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.26
2.5
Michiko Kono
25W–42L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
3
Beth Schryer
28W–49L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
2.24
2.5
Monica Spain
35W–69L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.