Search

Annika Andrews

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
113 matches · 68W–45L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.03
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 41 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
35%
stay 3.0
65%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 77% stay · 23% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.94. Lower than today’s 3.03 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
56 of 252
WA · 3.0
226 of 1107

Annika is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Annika has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Annika has gone from the 39th to the 92nd percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5
66.7%
14W–7L · 60.3% of games
3.0
65.4%
34W–18L · 56.9% of games
3.5
33.3%
8W–16L · 43.7% of games
6.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 53% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history113 matches
W
Rachel Rubens / Laura Schultink
2026-07-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Scott
0.020about as expected — took 67% of games against 69% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Sheila Wang
2026-07-14 · #1 Female Singles · 0.0
0.007about as expected — took 67% of games against 65% expected
6-3
W
Bri Plath / Gabriel Michaelchamps
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Houman Farokhzad
0.017below expectation — took 50% of games against 58% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Ed Ulman / Sandra Mullenchamps
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · with Houman Farokhzad
+0.074better than expected — took 100% of games against 58% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Keinan Paulino / Molly Linhardtchamps
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · with Eric Lam
0.042below expectation — took 25% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Chattin
0.021about as expected — took 65% of games against 68% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
Catherine Cline / SERGIO VICTORIOmixed
2026-06-28 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Eric Lam
+0.000about as expected — took 60% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Corinne Crabs / Karin Loen
2026-06-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Scott
+0.011better than expected — took 92% of games against 74% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-06-04 · #2 Singles · 3.5
0.019below expectation — took 8% of games against 29% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Louise Farrell
+0.012about as expected — took 50% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-21 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.022better than expected — took 39% of games against 34% expected
6-4, 5-3
W
Jenni Rhodes
2026-05-19 · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.008better than expected — took 92% of games against 75% expected
6-1, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.