← Search

Jeffrey Abram

Edmonds, WA
4.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
77 matches · 27W–50L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jeffrey Abram to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history77 matches
W
2026-08-08 · HBSQ-Garfield/Rea · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Rea mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-08 · NWW-HBSQ-Morrow · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kate Quinn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · NWW-HBSQ-Morrow · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kate Quinn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-11 · HBSQ-Garfield/Rea · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Liner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-14 · HBSQ-Garfield/Rea · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Erin Vikstrom mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-07 · HBSQ-Harbor Squarrels-Robey · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Vana
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-24 · HBSQ-Harbor Squarrels-Robey · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tate Seefried
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-09 · HBSQ-Harbor Squarrels-Robey · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Youssef Shalaby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-26 · HBSQ-Harbor Squarrels-Robey · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mohammad Ashrafuzzaman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-4
L
2026-04-25 · HBSQ-Shalaby · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chien Chang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-18 · HBSQ-Harbor Squarrels-Robey · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Youssef Shalaby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-13 · HBSQ-Harbor Squarrels-Robey · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Killey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 54.8% of games
4.5
26.1%
12W–34L · 40.2% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
26.7%
4W–11L · 41.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
19 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams