Search

Jeffrey Abram

Edmonds, WA
4.0A year-end 2025
75 matches · 25W–50L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.77
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 18 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
100%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Edmonds · 4.0
5 of 9
WA · 4.0
194 of 782

Jeffrey is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jeffrey has played at 4.5, 4.0 across 7 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.54.04.52019202020212022202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Jeffrey has gone from the 22nd to the 2nd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 54.8% of games
4.5
26.1%
12W–34L · 40.2% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
26.7%
4W–11L · 41.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history75 matches
W
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kate Quinn
+0.000better than expected — took 65% of games against 50% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
Ann Wilson / Joseph Rodinmixed
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Liner
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-14 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Erin Vikstrom
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Tyler Parsons / DHARAM PATULE
2026-06-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Vana
+0.016better than expected — took 60% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Girish Patwardhan / Rohan Patwardhan
2026-05-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tate Seefried
0.011about as expected — took 57% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Youssef Shalaby
0.025below expectation — took 42% of games against 53% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
JON COOMBES / Jay Lee
2026-04-26 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mohammad Ashrafuzzaman
0.054below expectation — took 45% of games against 65% expected
7-6, 4-3
L
Ryan Johnson / Zachary Chen
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chien Chang
+0.002below expectation — took 25% of games against 32% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Charles Oliver / Alex Tan
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Youssef Shalaby
0.031below expectation — took 61% of games against 69% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-13 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Killey
0.022below expectation — took 33% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Robert Lewis / Clifford Flekser
2026-03-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gavin Landon
0.020below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Brant Lyerla / Scott Griff
2026-03-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Killey
+0.016better than expected — took 71% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.