← Search

Lael Banner

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
61 matches · 48W–13L · seasons 2022–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.85
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 6 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
97%
stay 4.0
3%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.80. Lower than today’s 3.85 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 4.0
35 of 186
WA · 4.0
105 of 782

Lael is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lael has been a steady 4.0 across all 5 seasons on record.

3.54.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Lael has gone from the 92nd to the 99th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.0
90.7%
39W–4L · 62.6% of games
4.5
25%
1W–3L · 50% of games
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 55.7% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history61 matches
W
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · with Adam Kay
+0.021better than expected — took 62% of games against 51% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
Rong Qiang Xu / Raghu Havaldar
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Kong
+0.007better than expected — took 71% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Kay
+0.025better than expected — took 58% of games against 47% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-03-28 · #3 Doubles · with Adam Kay
−0.029below expectation — took 38% of games against 52% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-01-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Kay
−0.063below expectation — took 41% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
David Gravenkemper / Rob Leidle
2026-01-03 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Glenn Chinn
−0.004about as expected — took 65% of games against 63% expected
7-6, 6-1
W
N/A
2025-07-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bryan Cossette
−0.068about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charles Borberg
+0.017better than expected — took 65% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
Ryan Ebisu
2025-05-31 · #2 Singles · 4.0
−0.028below expectation — took 57% of games against 66% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
Hamid Sheikhghanbari / Tom Waldman
2025-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bryan Cossette
−0.045below expectation — took 47% of games against 66% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Jenson Yuen / Pierre Martin
2025-03-30 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Kay
+0.042better than expected — took 92% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-02-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Glenn Chinn
−0.010better than expected — took 86% of games against 77% expected
6-1, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.