Search

Jeffrey Nguyen

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
80 matches · 46W–34L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.76
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 13 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
100%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 4.0
52 of 186
WA · 4.0
215 of 782

Jeffrey is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jeffrey has been 4.0 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.54.0202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Jeffrey has gone from the 44th to the 70th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.0
65.4%
34W–18L · 54.7% of games
4.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 40.6% of games
8.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 46% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history80 matches
W
Alex Yi / Vivek Savsanichamps
2026-06-21 · #2 Doubles · with Matthew Ip
0.013below expectation — took 44% of games against 52% expected
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Yu Xiao / Andrew Zhangchamps
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Matthew Ip
+0.028better than expected — took 62% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · with Matthew Ip
0.021below expectation — took 38% of games against 49% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
Eliot Tong / Daniel Song
2026-06-07 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Ip
+0.008about as expected — took 50% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Nguyen
0.010about as expected — took 68% of games against 67% expected
7-6, 6-0
W
Peter Gregory / Nathan Hambley
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peilun Shan
+0.001about as expected — took 57% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Ip
+0.009about as expected — took 50% of games against 48% expected
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
Brett Shell / Jason Shinn
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Ip
0.018about as expected — took 63% of games against 66% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Daniel Fan / Satoshi Setoguchi
2026-04-12 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Nguyen
0.046below expectation — took 25% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Yutaro Maki / Bryan Whitehurst
2026-04-04 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peilun Shan
+0.039better than expected — took 75% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-11-28 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.016better than expected — took 54% of games against 48% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
Arindam Majumder / Anita Marreromixed
2025-11-15 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Haley Zeylmaker
+0.000better than expected — took 63% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.