Teams

More Serve Aces!

2026 One Doubles · 4.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.92 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesGlenn Chinn / Johan Bjorklund vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-08-04vs M & JoeWon 10
W#1 DoublesJohan Bjorklund / Adam Kay vs Murali Musturnagarajan / Adam Corson6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2026-08-03vs TeamOneWon 10
W#1 DoublesJordan Bluehdorn / Lael Banner vs Vaibhav Bora / DHARAM PATULE6-1, 6-3
2026-08-02vs BC-LobstersWon 10
W#1 DoublesAdam Kay / Charles Borberg vs David Park / Derek Lee6-2, 6-2
2026-07-25vs Broken StringsWon 10
W#1 DoublesJohan Bjorklund / Jordan Bluehdorn vs Jianjun Zhu / Daifu Ye6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Lael Banner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.87
Glenn Chinn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.86
Charles Borberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Adam Kay
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Johan Bjorklund
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.49
Jordan Bluehdorn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adam Kay + Lael Banner19261% games+8.0% vs expected
Charles Borberg + Lael Banner5354% games+7.0% vs expected
Glenn Chinn + Lael Banner6069% games+5.4% vs expected
Glenn Chinn + Adam Kay5262% games+3.8% vs expected
Adam Kay + Charles Borberg10654% games+1.8% vs expected
Charles Borberg + Johan Bjorklund3649% games−4.6% vs expected
Glenn Chinn + Charles Borberg4255% gamesnot enough data
Glenn Chinn + Johan Bjorklund3263% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lael Banner
49W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.88
4
Glenn Chinn
92W–58L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.87
4
Charles Borberg
138W–97L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Adam Kay
54W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Johan Bjorklund
90W–53L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.76
3.5
Jordan Bluehdorn
60W–56L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.49

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.