← Search

Maurene Cronyn

EDMONDS, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
116 matches · 65W–51L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.90
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 13 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
90%
stay 3.0
10%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 98% stay · 2% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.84. Lower than today’s 2.90 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 3.0
431 of 755

Maurene is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Maurene has been 3.0 for all 3 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.0201920202025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Maurene has gone from the 49th to the 45th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
0.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 56.1% of games
3.0
35.7%
5W–9L · 47.5% of games
6.0
55.3%
26W–21L · 53.7% of games
7.0
84.6%
11W–2L · 60.8% of games
6.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 50.8% of games
7.0mixed
25%
3W–9L · 41.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history116 matches
W
Jude Neldam / Janice Bini
2026-07-17 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Susan Fyall
+0.036better than expected — took 59% of games against 43% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Maureen Sunn / Monika Ries
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Liz Smalley
+0.037better than expected — took 67% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Sue Hott / Susan Bussell
2026-07-03 · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Kathryn Strecker
+0.059better than expected — took 92% of games against 58% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-05-28 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan James
−0.065below expectation — took 8% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
Karen Larson / Barbara Selemon
2026-05-20 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan James
+0.025better than expected — took 72% of games against 57% expected
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-05-08 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sara Kuhl
+0.008about as expected — took 43% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
Yassi Cain / Marcia Chapman
2026-03-18 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Eileen Martin
+0.031better than expected — took 65% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
Nancy Economopoulos / Janice Walters
2026-02-11 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Denise Black
+0.015better than expected — took 46% of games against 40% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
Scott Brown / Marti Jablonmixed
2026-02-07 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chris Pino
+0.000below expectation — took 35% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
Shelly Enstrom / Pamela Olson
2026-01-28 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kelli Adams
+0.026better than expected — took 39% of games against 32% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
Mark Jones / Jennifer Charronmixed
2026-01-17 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jay Reid
+0.000better than expected — took 40% of games against 6% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Jean MacHiz / Mary Esper
2026-01-15 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ruth Adler
+0.106better than expected — took 92% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.