Search

Marcia Chapman

Kirkland, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
66 matches · 25W–41L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.67
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 13 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
2%
down to 2.5
98%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Kirkland · 3.0
41 of 49
WA · 3.0
890 of 960

Marcia is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Marcia has been 3.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Marcia has gone from the 66th to the 2nd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
34.5%
10W–19L · 44.5% of games
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
48.1%
13W–14L · 48.5% of games
6.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 28.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history66 matches
W
Cindy Quitasol / Robert Richardmixed
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gregg Watkins
+0.000better than expected — took 53% of games against 37% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Kimberly Wong / Amy Wang
2026-07-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kaylee Nilan
+0.014better than expected — took 44% of games against 39% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julee Moore
+0.005about as expected — took 35% of games against 37% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
Mario Hernandez / Jane Shivelymixed
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark LeMaster
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Laura Kerr / Amy Friedland
2026-06-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Taylor
0.001about as expected — took 38% of games against 41% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Anne Bentley / Lindsey Nelson
2026-04-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marlene Butterworth
0.011below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Diane Musgrove / Barbara Maher
2026-03-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Buller
+0.023about as expected — took 32% of games against 29% expected
7-5, 6-1
L
Maurene Cronyn / Eileen Martin
2026-03-18 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Yassi Cain
0.020below expectation — took 35% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-03-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kaylee Nilan
0.031below expectation — took 14% of games against 37% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-02-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy McArthur
+0.079better than expected — took 100% of games against 56% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Sabine Shor / Karen Keinert
2026-02-18 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Julee Moore
+0.024better than expected — took 75% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Carol Guattare / Joanna Hennessy
2026-02-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynda Carlson
0.006below expectation — took 20% of games against 32% expected
6-3, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.