Search

Lynda Carlson

Kirkland, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
117 matches · 43W–74L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.66
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
2%
down to 2.5
98%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Kirkland · 3.0
27 of 31
WA · 3.0
711 of 755

Lynda is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lynda has been 3.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Lynda has gone from the 64th to the 11th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
38.6%
17W–27L · 46.6% of games
3.5
0%
0W–5L · 27.4% of games
6.0
44.4%
20W–25L · 49.3% of games
7.0
18.2%
2W–9L · 43.5% of games
6.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 46.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history117 matches
L
2026-04-30 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lili Chang
0.039below expectation — took 28% of games against 49% expected
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-04-21 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Goldberg
0.033below expectation — took 33% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-16 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Greenlaw
+0.003about as expected — took 29% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Andrea Lang / Amanda Weaver
2026-02-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Oroszlan
+0.015below expectation — took 14% of games against 21% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Tiffany Buck / Wendy Walker
2026-02-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Goldberg
0.014below expectation — took 37% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Aki Tameling / Cinderella Gatcheco
2026-02-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Greenlaw
0.004below expectation — took 20% of games against 31% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Carol Guattare / Joanna Hennessy
2026-02-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marcia Chapman
0.029below expectation — took 20% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-01-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Greenlaw
+0.016about as expected — took 33% of games against 32% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Geeta McCormack / Natalie Matthews
2025-11-07 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kelly Chiang
+0.049better than expected — took 67% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Rebecca Zimmer / Alysson Bashey
2025-10-17 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Greenlaw
0.008below expectation — took 35% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
Diane Lee / Jackie Fuller
2025-10-10 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Greenlaw
0.044below expectation — took 25% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Mary Turino / Kimberly Caponigro
2025-09-19 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lili Chang
+0.038better than expected — took 60% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.