← Search

Barbara Selemon

Seattle, WA
3.0A year-end 2025
140 matches · 55W–85L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.60
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
10%
down to 2.5
90%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 7% down · 93% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.62. Higher than today’s 2.60 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
140 of 144
WA · 3.0
740 of 755

Barbara is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Barbara has been 3.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Barbara has gone from the 53rd to the 39th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
0.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.0
34.5%
19W–36L · 45.1% of games
6.0
42.4%
25W–34L · 48.3% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 46.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history140 matches
L
2026-06-12 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jill Wakefield
+0.042better than expected — took 50% of games against 34% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Maurene Cronyn / Susan James
2026-05-20 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Larson
−0.025below expectation — took 28% of games against 43% expected
6-0, 7-5
L
Bonnie Currey / Diane Kuenster
2026-04-28 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kimberly Baisch
−0.026below expectation — took 48% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-21 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sally Linebarger
+0.033better than expected — took 67% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Diana Jordt / Roseshel Howe
2026-02-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joan Murray
−0.014below expectation — took 38% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
Tammy Besel / Susan van Meter
2026-02-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Grimes
−0.014below expectation — took 33% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Jane Vail / Monica Spain
2026-02-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Estes
+0.030better than expected — took 63% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Suzanne Vannatter / Veena Shankaran
2026-01-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Estes
−0.044below expectation — took 20% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Sheila Connolly / Wendy Champagne
2025-11-01 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lori Estes
−0.015below expectation — took 25% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
N/A
2025-10-12 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Emily Swanson
+0.060better than expected — took 100% of games against 62% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Michell Marx / Yvonne Collins
2025-05-29 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jill Wakefield
+0.023better than expected — took 55% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
Nancy Edwards / Corinne Walsh
2025-05-15 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Terry Holtgraves
+0.016better than expected — took 43% of games against 38% expected
7-6, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.