← Search

Barbara Selemon

Seattle, WA
3.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
140 matches · 55W–85L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Barbara Selemon to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history140 matches
L
2026-06-12 · BETC-Hughes · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jill Wakefield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-20 · BETC-Hughes · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Larson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-28 · BETC-Hughes · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kimberly Baisch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-21 · BETC-Hughes · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sally Linebarger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-02-21 · AYTC-Trumbauer · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joan Murray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-02-15 · AYTC-Trumbauer · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Grimes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-01 · AYTC-Trumbauer · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Estes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-01-04 · AYTC-Trumbauer · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Estes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-01 · AYTC-Trumbauer · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lori Estes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
N/A
2025-10-12 · AYTC-Trumbauer · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Emily Swanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-05-29 · BETC-Hughes · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jill Wakefield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-15 · BETC-Hughes · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Terry Holtgraves
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.0
34.5%
19W–36L · 45.1% of games
6.0
42.4%
25W–34L · 48.3% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 46.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 56% of the time
#3 Doubles
56%
78 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
29 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer