← Search

Jill Wakefield

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
154 matches · 90W–64L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jill Wakefield to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history154 matches
W
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · with MARILYN PORTER championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with MARILYN PORTER championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-12 · BETC-Hughes · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Selemon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-04 · BETC-Hughes · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pamela Menchaca
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-28 · BETC-Hughes · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pamela Menchaca
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-07 · BETC-Hughes · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ann Goodenberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-01 · BETC-Ladies of the Net-Ferrera · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ruthann Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-28 · BETC-Hughes · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ann Goodenberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-14 · BETC-Hughes · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pamela Menchaca
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-02-28 · NWW-BETC-Ikeda · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Morse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-22 · NWW-BETC-Ikeda · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pamela Menchaca
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-02-07 · NWW-BETC-Ikeda · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ming Vuong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
55.8%
29W–23L · 52.3% of games
6.0
54.2%
32W–27L · 55% of games
7.0
76.9%
10W–3L · 59.8% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
62 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
53 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
37 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe