Search

Wendy Champagne

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
108 matches · 40W–68L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.84
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 17 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
98%
stay 3.0
2%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
143 of 213
WA · 3.0
612 of 960

Wendy is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Wendy has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Wendy has gone from the 3rd to the 51st percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
52.8%
19W–17L · 53.7% of games
3.0
27.9%
17W–44L · 40.5% of games
6.0
50%
4W–4L · 46.9% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history108 matches
W
2026-07-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lois James
+0.041better than expected — took 63% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laurent Bellange
+0.000about as expected — took 32% of games against 29% expected
6-0, 7-6
W
Hannah Smolinski / Angela Wang
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lois James
+0.026better than expected — took 50% of games against 41% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Alison MacBeth / Jun Fang
2026-06-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lois James
+0.025better than expected — took 65% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
Bekah Burdick / Anne Roddy
2026-06-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lois James
+0.048better than expected — took 75% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Carrie Barrios / Alexis Wood
2026-06-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lois James
0.042below expectation — took 20% of games against 44% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-06-19 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Erik Fraker
+0.000better than expected — took 29% of games against 15% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Andrea Haines / Chandra Gordon
2026-06-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lois James
0.065below expectation — took 20% of games against 54% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
Caiping Zang / Christina Ntouniaoglou
2026-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alice Bankson
+0.012better than expected — took 67% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Jennifer Longtin / Laurie Bauder
2026-05-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julia Sommerfeld
0.023below expectation — took 40% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Elizabeth Alaniz / Allison Lindsay
2026-05-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janice Walters
+0.057better than expected — took 80% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Xiaoyan Wei
2026-05-17 · #2 Singles · 3.0
0.046below expectation — took 29% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.