← Search

Ann Wood

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2024
98 matches · 49W–49L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.92
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
85%
stay 3.0
15%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 96% stay · 4% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.86. Lower than today’s 2.92 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
90 of 144
WA · 3.0
395 of 755

Ann is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Ann has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.53.03.52019202020212022202320242026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Ann has gone from the 69th to the 60th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
62.5%
35W–21L · 54.2% of games
3.5
21.1%
4W–15L · 42.9% of games
6.0
25%
1W–3L · 39% of games
6.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 49.8% of games
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history98 matches
L
Carrie Barrios / Alexis Wood
2026-07-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alicia Alberg
−0.041below expectation — took 29% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Wendy Champagne / Lois James
2026-07-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alicia Alberg
−0.041below expectation — took 37% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Alison MacBeth / Krista Davis
2026-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alicia Alberg
+0.011better than expected — took 75% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
Belle Chen / Erica Jordanchamps
2026-06-12 · #2 Doubles · with Jacqueline True
+0.020about as expected — took 33% of games against 31% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Juiling Edmonds / Amy Galanes
2026-06-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jacqueline True
+0.018better than expected — took 65% of games against 55% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
Tammy Miller / Wendy van Den Smith
2026-05-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Gravrock
+0.030better than expected — took 71% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Dhivya Seetharaman / Jenni Rhodes
2026-05-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with TESSA GORMAN
+0.078better than expected — took 100% of games against 56% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Tonya Dressel / Bryn Young
2026-03-31 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jacqueline True
+0.004about as expected — took 56% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Lang
+0.032better than expected — took 42% of games against 32% expected
7-5, 7-5
W
Jan Stroh / Elnaz Ansari
2026-02-08 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jacqueline True
+0.062better than expected — took 58% of games against 35% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Jila Pashai / Alina Galan
2026-01-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Gravrock
+0.012about as expected — took 47% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
Julie Dewitt / Bunny Rogan
2026-01-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rachel Stroble
−0.017below expectation — took 20% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.