← Search

Belle Chen

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
50 matches · 23W–27L · seasons 2024–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.09
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 25 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
14%
stay 3.0
86%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 59% stay · 41% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.98. Lower than today’s 3.09 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
48 of 397
WA · 3.0
168 of 1529

Belle is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Belle has been a steady 3.0 across all 3 seasons on record.

2.53.0202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Belle has gone from the 19th to the 57th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
55%
11W–9L · 52% of games
3.5
21.4%
3W–11L · 44.1% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 47.5% of games
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history50 matches
L
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sienna Rice
+0.031better than expected — took 53% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Fang
−0.038below expectation — took 41% of games against 58% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
Chiqu Lichamps
2026-06-21 · #1 Singles
−0.022below expectation — took 20% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Alexia Cosatto / Elizabeth Parkerchamps
2026-06-14 · #2 Doubles · with Erica Jordan
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
Ann Wood / Jacqueline Truechamps
2026-06-12 · #2 Doubles · with Erica Jordan
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-31 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.041better than expected — took 52% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Chau
+0.004about as expected — took 53% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-17 · #2 Singles · 3.5
−0.010below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
N/A
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Justine Lin
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-0, 6-0
L
Cameron Behrens
2026-05-09 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erica Jordan
+0.013better than expected — took 62% of games against 55% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
Tena Hanson / Ingrid Munck
2026-04-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Teanen Chen
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.