← Search

Erica Jordan

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
60 matches · 32W–28L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Erica Jordan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history60 matches
L
2026-08-09 · #2 Doubles · with Belle Chen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Audrey Nguyen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Belle Chen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Belle Chen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
Sarah Bierlink / Ali Jones - (DQ)
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Teanen Chen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-14 · #2 Doubles · with Belle Chen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-12 · #2 Doubles · with Belle Chen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-31 · NWW-RBW-Chau · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenn Gile
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-30 · NWW-WSC-Hashimoto · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Pan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-17 · NWW-RBW-Chau · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenn Gile
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-01 · NWW-RBW-Chau · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Riley Beirne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-04-19 · NWW-RBW-Chau · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Belle Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
43.8%
7W–9L · 51.9% of games
3.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 51.8% of games
3.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 52.4% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 58.8% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 39.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
12 matches
#1 Female Doubles
10%
6 matches
#1 Singles
10%
6 matches
#1 Female Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams