← Search

Theresa Cochran

Edmonds, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
57 matches · 25W–32L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Theresa Cochran to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history57 matches
W
2026-07-11 · HBSQ-Reda/Tandon · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kevin Mcdonald mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-06-27 · HBSQ-Reda/Tandon · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Forrest Carlson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-21 · HBSQ-Reda/Tandon · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Forrest Carlson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-17 · HBSQ-String Sirens-Roberts · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Courtney Whitmore Wyckoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-18 · HBSQ-String Sirens-Roberts · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-12 · HBSQ-String Sirens-Roberts · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yuki Hayashi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-07 · HBSQ-Swing Sisters-Matysik · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Chandler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-22 · HBSQ-Swing Sisters-Matysik · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Chandler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-02-07 · HBSQ-Swing Sisters-Matysik · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gayle Burlinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-01-17 · HBSQ-Swing Sisters-Matysik · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barty Nicholson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-06-01 · HBSQ-Simply Smashing-Siegrist · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barty Nicholson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2025-05-25 · HBSQ-Simply Smashing-Siegrist · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Vikstrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
37.8%
14W–23L · 45.5% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
57.1%
8W–6L · 55.1% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 49% of the time
#3 Doubles
49%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
10 matches
#1 Singles
7%
4 matches
#2 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert