Search

Samantha Garcia

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
97 matches · 30W–67L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.74
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 18 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
129 of 144
WA · 3.0
653 of 755

Samantha is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Samantha has been 3.0 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

2.53.0202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Samantha has gone from the 12th to the 23rd percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.0
36.2%
29W–51L · 45.1% of games
6.0mixed
7.1%
1W–13L · 36% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history97 matches
L
Katrina Lau / Valeriia Zaychenko
2026-07-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Schiller
0.005below expectation — took 20% of games against 31% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Hannah Kim / Courtney Levitsky
2026-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Schiller
+0.023better than expected — took 61% of games against 50% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Catherine Nielsen / Veena Shankaran
2026-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Schiller
+0.036better than expected — took 72% of games against 53% expected
6-0, 7-5
L
Angela Lewis / Kelsey Sturman
2026-06-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Schiller
+0.008better than expected — took 56% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
Ellen Jones / Laura Kirkland
2026-05-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vivian Jackson
0.038below expectation — took 53% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Olivia Salinas
+0.012about as expected — took 33% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Yuchen Zhang / Sasha Tanji
2026-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nikki Wildfang
0.043below expectation — took 20% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Daria Opekunova / Jemimah Kim
2026-04-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessica Young
0.014below expectation — took 33% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Rachel Malen / Monika Sharma
2026-04-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cara Lewallen
+0.009about as expected — took 41% of games against 39% expected
4-6, 6-1
L
Jade Phan / Pamela Menchacachamps
2026-03-20 · #1 Doubles · with Vivian Jackson
+0.025better than expected — took 50% of games against 39% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
Sarah Chandler / Theresa Cochran
2026-02-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jolene Parisio
0.001about as expected — took 46% of games against 46% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
Abby Miller / Renee Pitra
2026-02-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Cowger
0.006about as expected — took 38% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.