Search

Erin Schiller

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
216 matches · 68W–148L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.88
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 27 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
93%
stay 3.0
7%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 98% stay · 2% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.83. Lower than today’s 2.88 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
100 of 144
WA · 3.0
459 of 755

Erin is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Erin has been 3.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Erin has gone from the 12th to the 20th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
33.1%
44W–89L · 45% of games
3.5
3.4%
1W–28L · 29.4% of games
6.0mixed
42.2%
19W–26L · 47.8% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history216 matches
L
Katrina Lau / Valeriia Zaychenko
2026-07-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Samantha Garcia
0.005below expectation — took 20% of games against 31% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Dawn Spratley / Laurent Bellangemixed
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matt Topping
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Hannah Kim / Courtney Levitsky
2026-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Samantha Garcia
+0.023better than expected — took 61% of games against 50% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Catherine Nielsen / Veena Shankaran
2026-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Samantha Garcia
+0.036better than expected — took 72% of games against 53% expected
6-0, 7-5
L
Angela Lewis / Kelsey Sturman
2026-06-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Samantha Garcia
+0.008better than expected — took 56% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
Katie Busby / Larry Nguyenmixed
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Edwin Carlos Sr
+0.000better than expected — took 48% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
Kari Hamilton / Lindsay Donovan
2026-06-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leah Carroll
+0.049better than expected — took 44% of games against 28% expected
7-6, 7-5
W
Vanessa Yang / Katherine Matias
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nikki Wildfang
+0.036better than expected — took 68% of games against 50% expected
7-5, 6-1
L
Melissa Scott / Priyanka Prasad
2026-04-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Johnson
0.024below expectation — took 20% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Qiong Wei
2026-04-25 · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.003about as expected — took 47% of games against 45% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Chiqu Li
2026-04-18 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.051below expectation — took 0% of games against 35% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Estelle Erhardt
2026-04-11 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.026below expectation — took 8% of games against 31% expected
6-0, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.