← Search

Priyanka Prasad

Bellevue, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
100 matches · 65W–35L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Priyanka Prasad to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history100 matches
L
2026-07-18 · BC-Match Point-McCullough · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ratish Prasad mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-17 · Tennis Troopers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brendalen Hutchinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-10 · Tennis Troopers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chrissy Bauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · BC-Match Point-McCullough · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ratish Prasad mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-30 · BC-Slay Sisters-McCullough · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-17 · BC-Slay Sisters-McCullough · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy McCullough
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-05-01 · BC-Slay Sisters-McCullough · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-26 · BC-Slay Sisters-McCullough · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-04-03 · BC-Slay Sisters-McCullough · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy McCullough
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-11-09 · BC-Hancock/Myers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ratish Prasad mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2025-10-18 · BC-Hancock/Myers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ratish Prasad mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-10-04 · BC-Hancock/Myers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ratish Prasad mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2016–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
62.5%
20W–12L · 55.6% of games
3.5
50%
10W–10L · 49.4% of games
6.0mixed
84.2%
16W–3L · 69.2% of games
7.0mixed
60%
12W–8L · 59.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
26 matches
#1 Singles
14%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
10 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams