Search

Kevyn Hauser

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
48 matches · 16W–32L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.23
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
202 of 311
WA · 3.5
832 of 1364

Kevyn is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kevyn has been a steady 3.5 across all 6 seasons on record.

3.03.5201920212023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Kevyn has gone from the 8th to the 39th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
29.3%
12W–29L · 40.9% of games
7.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 54.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history48 matches
L
Kathy Kenny / Daye Chung
2026-07-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mikhaila Reudink
+0.004about as expected — took 32% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-07-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Salvadalena
+0.018better than expected — took 59% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-05-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Holt
0.018below expectation — took 41% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
Sandy Margoles / Angelyn Regala
2026-04-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Spencer-Snyder
0.043below expectation — took 29% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Yogita MANGHNANI / Michelle Weijia Cai
2026-04-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paricia Axtell
0.002below expectation — took 29% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Carol LaMoria / Jane Lee
2026-04-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Spencer-Snyder
+0.014better than expected — took 59% of games against 52% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-03-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Hanseler
+0.019about as expected — took 35% of games against 32% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-03-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nari Benson
+0.043better than expected — took 71% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Victoria Huang / Ann McGovern
2026-01-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Salvadalena
+0.004about as expected — took 53% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nari Benson
+0.012better than expected — took 60% of games against 54% expected
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
Sarah Yoon / Xue Song
2026-01-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Treasa Sweek
+0.022better than expected — took 58% of games against 48% expected
7-6, 4-2
L
2025-10-11 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Helen Spencer-Snyder
0.008below expectation — took 35% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.