Search

Jamie Smith

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
97 matches · 70W–27L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.52
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
42%
stay 3.5
58%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 81% stay · 19% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.43. Lower than today’s 3.52 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
15 of 256
WA · 3.5
72 of 1209

Jamie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jamie has been 3.5 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Jamie has gone from the 92nd to the 88th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
80.3%
61W–15L · 61.7% of games
4.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 49.1% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history97 matches
L
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · with Keli Faw
0.028below expectation — took 39% of games against 52% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Mary Digenan / Tina Sypher
2026-05-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacy Anderson
+0.031better than expected — took 75% of games against 57% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-05-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Wietholter
0.010below expectation — took 33% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacy Anderson
+0.062better than expected — took 80% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Catherine Davidson / Christine Holm
2026-04-10 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Monica Blum
+0.004about as expected — took 37% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-03-27 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Cahill
+0.011about as expected — took 45% of games against 43% expected
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Jennifer Hanseler / Kevyn Hauser
2026-03-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa McMurray
0.017about as expected — took 65% of games against 67% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-01-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacy Anderson
0.038below expectation — took 47% of games against 64% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-01-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Cahill
+0.041better than expected — took 55% of games against 39% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-01-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alison Scott
0.001better than expected — took 71% of games against 65% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-01-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julia Hartvigson
+0.020better than expected — took 52% of games against 45% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
Juan Chavez / Karen Panmixed
2025-09-28 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ethan Chung
+0.000below expectation — took 44% of games against 59% expected
7-6, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.