← Search

Stacy Chia

Shoreline, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
82 matches · 46W–36L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Stacy Chia to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history82 matches
L
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Max Genereaux championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-02 · NWW-HBSQ-Morrow · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Blake Garfield mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-31 · The Vibe Tribe · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ali Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-22 · The Vibe Tribe · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jenni Clay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-07-18 · HBSQ-Mattingly-Nelson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ben Chia mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-18 · NWW-HBSQ-Morrow · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Martin Uylangco mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-15 · The Vibe Tribe · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nichole Ikeda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · HBSQ-Mattingly-Nelson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ben Chia mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-06-28 · HBSQ-Mattingly-Nelson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ben Chia mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-25 · The Vibe Tribe · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nichole Ikeda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-05 · HBSQ-Brodersen · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-28 · HBSQ-Brodersen · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
63.9%
23W–13L · 54.4% of games
3.5
29.2%
7W–17L · 46.1% of games
7.0mixed
70.6%
12W–5L · 57.8% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
16 matches
#1 Singles
17%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
13 matches
#2 Singles
9%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe