Search

Shanna Chua

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
171 matches · 103W–68L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.54
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 41 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
31%
stay 3.5
69%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 74% stay · 26% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.45. Lower than today’s 3.54 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
11 of 256
WA · 3.5
54 of 1209

Shanna is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Shanna has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Shanna has gone from the 36th to the 63rd percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
0.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 48.3% of games
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
45.3%
29W–35L · 50.5% of games
4.0
41.2%
7W–10L · 47% of games
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 64.7% of games
7.0mixed
65.2%
15W–8L · 58.8% of games
8.0mixed
100%
7W–0L · 57.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history171 matches
L
Katherine Markert / Jessie Drakulich
2026-07-22 · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Roun Lee
0.073below expectation — took 25% of games against 60% expected
6-2
L
Khin Oo
2026-07-15 · #1 Female Singles · 0.0
0.110below expectation — took 25% of games against 69% expected
6-2
W
2026-07-12 · #2 Doubles · with Paul Yi
+0.000about as expected — took 67% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Paul Yi
+0.000better than expected — took 100% of games against 69% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · with Paul Yi
+0.000better than expected — took 52% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Tami Davis / Corey Westmixedchamps
2026-07-10 · #3 Doubles · with Paul Yi
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 61% expected
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-07-08 · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Shelby Hill
+0.030better than expected — took 86% of games against 64% expected
6-1
L
Laura Walsh / Shan Zhumixedchamps
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Ellen Acuario
+0.000about as expected — took 45% of games against 45% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
Keli Faw / Jamie Smithmixedchamps
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · with Leah Freed
+0.000better than expected — took 61% of games against 51% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Corddry
0.023about as expected — took 72% of games against 73% expected
7-5, 6-0
W
Jeng Tcheung / Chardie Byrne
2026-05-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yasmeen Mar
+0.005better than expected — took 71% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Christina Hua / Susan Kim
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yasmeen Mar
0.014below expectation — took 47% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.