← Search

Paul Yi

Seattle, WA
4.5C year-end 2023
41 matches · 37W–4L · seasons 2023–2026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.40
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 19 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 4.0
90%
stay 4.5
10%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 98% stay · 2% up, from a year-end estimate of 4.34. Lower than today’s 4.40 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 4.5
4 of 110
WA · 4.5
8 of 387

Paul is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Paul has been 4.5 for all 2 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

4.04.520232026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.5
90%
9W–1L · 60.4% of games
8.0mixed
92.3%
12W–1L · 58.3% of games
9.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 58.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history41 matches
W
2026-07-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hiromichi Yamamoto
−0.005about as expected — took 63% of games against 62% expected
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-07-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hiromichi Yamamoto
+0.018better than expected — took 67% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-12 · #2 Doubles · with Shanna Chua
−0.010about as expected — took 67% of games against 66% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Shanna Chua
+0.043better than expected — took 100% of games against 68% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · with Shanna Chua
+0.013about as expected — took 52% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-10 · #3 Doubles · with Shanna Chua
+0.021better than expected — took 75% of games against 60% expected
6-0, 6-4
W
Alexander Calpagiu / Lucas Gorrettachamps
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Miles Lander
+0.051better than expected — took 71% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Miles Lander
+0.003about as expected — took 52% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
Daniel Snyder / Alex Schulz
2026-05-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Miles Lander
−0.025about as expected — took 71% of games against 72% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jonathan Newman
+0.011better than expected — took 62% of games against 56% expected
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
Daniel Song / Junu Jeon
2026-04-19 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Djelli Berisha
−0.015about as expected — took 58% of games against 62% expected
7-5, 7-5
W
Whitney Garrett / Clay Dudleychamps
2025-12-13 · #3 Doubles · with Shanna Chua
+0.011better than expected — took 62% of games against 56% expected
7-5, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.